home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!genesis.demon.co.uk
- From: Lawrence Kirby <fred@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.apl
- Subject: Re: GOTO controversy
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 96 01:21:14 GMT
- Organization: none
- Message-ID: <827630474snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- References: <314FB5F5.259B@simi.is> <3151B47F.70FD@connix.com> <NICKB.96Mar22141650@abel.harlqn.co.uk>
- Reply-To: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: genesis.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.27
- X-Mail2News-Path: genesis.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <NICKB.96Mar22141650@abel.harlqn.co.uk>
- nickb@harlequin.co.uk "Nick Barnes" writes:
-
- >In article <4isrhqINNpol@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir
- > Kylheku) writes:
- >
- > recursion! ouch! I'd hate to do a no_loop(1,1000000000);
- >
- >Only because you are not familiar with compilers which perform
- >tail-recursion elimination.
-
- More to the point I am familiar with compiler (certainly C compilers) that
- don't perform tail-recursion elimination. While any such compilers are
- a possibility the recursive approach is trouble.
-
- --
- -----------------------------------------
- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com
- -----------------------------------------
-